"Tom Brinkman" <reportbase@gmail.com> wrote
Andy Little wrote:
Three positive reviews is not sufficient in my opinion. However, the precedent has already be set, as other libraries have been approved on a similar limited number of reviews.
Obvious questions in response to this... How many reviews are sufficient? What proportion in favour/against acceptance is acceptable?
The judgement of the library's review manager is the final determinent.
The criteria that he/she used to accept or reject the submission should be clearly stated in the review managers report after the review period is over.
Yes. In retrospect I could have done a lot better. I should not have allowed modifications to the library or the documentation during the review. My report was also severely lacking in detail. With benefit of experience, I shall try to do better next time. Andy Little