
19 Feb
2008
19 Feb
'08
1:23 a.m.
"Thorsten Ottosen" <thorsten.ottosen@dezide.com> wrote in message news:47B9E537.6040904@dezide.com...
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL_RANGE( ba::map_list_of("foo",1)("bar",2), get_map() );
Is it reasonable that operator<<() is required when we simply want to test comparison with ==? Perhaps there should be a way to get rid of that requirement?
There is. Use BOOST_TEST_DONT_PRINT_LOG_VALUE( the_type ). Gennadiy