[boost] Naming Proposed Libraries

When discussing libraries in public that are under development but not yet accepted into Boost, I think it's problematic to refer to "The Boost <whatever> library" or "Boost.<whatever>" without qualification. Our peer-review process is respected, and these libraries are not yet officially blessed by Boost. I don't want to dilute the value of Boost acceptance. Can we please make a habit of prepending "The proposed" or something similar? For example, I suggest "The proposed Boost Interfaces library." Thanks! P.S. I hope it's obvious, but I don't think the documentation for the proposed library ought to resort to such contortions. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com