Larry Evans wrote:
A new version has been uploaded to vault which uses fusion::pair. To facilitate this, a new fusion/support/intkey_val_pair_map.hpp file containing like-named template was created. What's interesting about this is that it seems that if instead of boost::variant, fusion::map were used with the intkey_val_pair_map as arg(maybe mpl::unpacked), then you'd have a tuple with possibly "named"(or enumed) instead of less meaningful unsigned indexes (i.e. args to get<>). OTOH, if, instead of fusion::pair, mpl::pair were used, and then the intkey_...map passed to mpl::map, then you have the mpl map with "named" indices.
I'm looking for a generalization that can simplify the coding of all the classes by defining a minimum number of templates that can be combined to get the most general results. Does that make sense?
Hi Larry, Pardon the delay in replying. Yeah, this makes perfect sense. Are there docs yet? Would you be interested in having it hosted in spirit2/support ? Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net