30 Apr
2008
30 Apr
'08
7:16 p.m.
AMDG shiwei xu wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj@gmail.com> wrote:
Since, stl_alloc holds a pointer to the real allocator, shouldn't stl_alloc<void, ...> also have such a pointer and the appropriate constructors?
??
boost/config.hpp provides BOOST_NO_PARTIAL_SPECIAILIZATION Your macros, should all be prefixed with BOOST_MEMORY to avoid conflicts. In Christ, Steven Watanabe