2 Dec
2004
2 Dec
'04
7:22 p.m.
On Dec 2, 2004, at 1:35 PM, Jody Hagins wrote:
What about a specialization for NO combiner (if you are worried about results being "forgotten" then maybe deduce it if the return type is void. This would still allow everything to work properly when you want a combiner (and it can always be optimized later ;-). In addition, it would allow users to not have to pay the expense of combiner stuff if they are not using it anyway...
We could specialize based on last_value<void>, which is essentially not a combiner. It's worth trying. Doug