Re: [boost] [TypeIndex] Peer review period for library acceptance begins, ending Thurs 21st Nov

On Friday 15 November 2013 19:51:35 Antony Polukhin wrote:

2013/11/14 Andrey Semashev <...>

...

class type_index {

boost::type_info const* m_type_info;

public: explicit type_index(boost::type_info const&); boost::type_info const& get() const; // as previously discussed: const char* name() const; const char* raw_name() const; std::string pretty_name() const;

};

Don't really like the "get()" name. Following name is more clear:

public: boost::type_info const& type_info() const noexcept;

Ok?

Yes, that would be fine. And another amendment. In my original pseudo-code type_id() returned type_index. It should actually be boost::type_info const&, and the function should be in type_info.hpp.