vicente.botet <vicente.botet <at> wanadoo.fr> writes:
From: "Ryan Gallagher" <ryan.gallagher <at> gmail.com> [snip]
Also, you might post a patch to trac. [snip]
I'm not a fan of this name and think that more should be done. For the method name, I think "num_expected_args" would be better. Further, "num_bound_args" and "num_remaining_args" may be nice to have.
Finally, I'd like to see better documentation on the already existing "size" method. It's somewhat buried in the html documentation and the header docs are not as clear as they should be.
you might post a patch to trac
I was wondering how long it'd take for someone to reply with this. ;-) I'm not really as antsy for the change as Joel may be. But if he doesn't mind I'd be happy to post a patch to trac in the next day or so. -Ryan