Eric Niebler-4 wrote
Boost.Bind is a smaller, simpler library that pulls in less code and has fewer dependencies. It also doesn't do anything that would require decltype, or an emulation thereof (Boost.TypeOf).
If Boost.Bind meets my needs (and std::bind is not available), I use it.
Thanks for clearing up the differences. In my ignorance, I actually wasn't even aware of Boost.Phoenix.Bind. It looks like it is functionally equivalent to my original request: Boost.Bind-like functionality where result_of is used internally to allow functors with multiple overloads of operator(). I appreciate the comments. Jason -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/bind-Request-use-result-of-instead-of-res... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.