2011/2/21 Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.com>:
On 2/20/2011 4:52 PM, Joachim Faulhaber wrote:
Although the web-site gives a different impression
That's the impression I go by.
, it is the most important steps for an
author to find a review manager in order to get his library into a formal review.
* First you find a review manager * then you ask the RVs if your RM is acceptable * then you usually get your library scheduled pretty quickly
My library is already scheduled using the protocol which Boost describes.
It's not difficult at all to get listed on the review schedule. The difficult part is to find a review manager. There are libraries that are staying in the queue for many months even years and nothing happens while libraries that are entering the queue that have a review manager are scheduled and reviewed within weeks. I'm not saying this to bother you. It's just my experience from the last 3 years. The Review Schedule on the boost web-size says: "Reviews are usually scheduled on a first-come-first-served basis" Yet in fact it has been a last come first serve process most of the time. And the crucial point is finding a review manager. Regards, Joachim