Re: [boost] [V2, 1.34] Qt support issues

Hallo Juergen! Juergen Hunold wrote:

Hi !

I think it would be best to rename "qt.jam" to "qt3.jam" and mark it as "unmaintained" or maybe "deprecated" or both. The old "qt4.jam" should be named "qt.jam".

I think this is the last chance to do a clean switch before we switch to V2 and provide an obsolete toolset as "qt.jam"

I hope that this change can be made while we are in feature freeze because V1 has never had any "official" support for any version of Qt.

Volodya, Thomas: What are you thinking about this ?

No objections from my side feel free to go ahead. Thomas -- Thomas Witt witt@acm.org