19 Sep
2013
19 Sep
'13
4:49 p.m.
On 19-09-2013 17:57, Niall Douglas wrote:
On 18 Sep 2013 at 20:29, Edward Diener wrote:
As someone who still would like to see my variadic data library be reviewed for possible acceptance into Boost I am most curious to know the reasons why no new libraries appear to be getting reviewed anymore.
Did you not see my post http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2013/09/206187.php? I offered to review manage someone's library in exchange for that person review managing AFIO.
Maybe that's not the best discipline that two authors act as review manager for eachother libraries. just my two cent. -Thorsten