21 Feb
2011
21 Feb
'11
5:05 a.m.
Gordon Woodhull wrote:
On Feb 20, 2011, at 8:37 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
Fair enough. This doesn't worry me very much, but - I think there should be a way to challenge a review afterward, through the Wizards and/or list as appropriate.
Actually there is already a mechanism for addressing this. I know this for a fact because I personally availed myself of it. The procedure can be summarized as follows: a) Understand and accept the objections raised the review which resulted in the library being rejected, b) redo the code/documentation c) re-submit. Worked for me. Robert Ramey