Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?

Stefan Strasser wrote:

one review manager for both libraries, even if there are seperate review periods. as far as I know the review manager isn't bound to the "votes" anyway, so he should be able to summarize all the problems people see in either library and suggest a way to address those, be it by accepting one of the two libraries, merging them, or rejecting both.

+1. One review manager will surely do a better job than two different managers. But this should not be mandatory. We are lacking managers, and strict binding libraries with managers will make things worse.