6 Apr
2015
6 Apr
'15
4:07 p.m.
-----Original Message----- From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Peter Dimov Sent: 06 April 2015 16:31 To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] [1.58.0] Release candidates available
Beman Dawes wrote:
Likewise, why isn't the default a 64-bit build on a 64-bit system?
Because you may want the software you're developing to run on 32 bit OSes, which is still the most common use case on Windows.
Ideally, you need the default on Windows to be to build both, but the address model is not encoded in the name, so that's not possible at present.
I think we need to discuss changing that. Paul --- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal UK LA8 8AB +44 (0) 1539 561830