26 Mar
2024
26 Mar
'24
1:03 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 5:56 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
My understanding of the original post is that dropping C++11 is what's desired
With respect to the libraries I have written, that's going a bit too far for my taste. Arbitrarily dropping C++11 does not sound like a great idea. If requiring at least C++14 offers a significant improvement in some aspect of a library (for example Boost.JSON) then the specifics of that improvement should be discussed and the cost/benefits analyzed. Thanks