[boost] Re: [wave] tool/lib

...

Actually this discussion moved slightly beside the point. My original point was that wave should be treated as a tool (like bjam). If (once) we agree on that we could discuss in detail what should it means.

But that's backwards! I certainly can't agree that it should be treated like a tool without understanding its implications.

No, it's not. I just propose to treat wave the same way we treat other tools in boost. Later on we could decide if we need to revise this treatment (for all tools). These are two independent decisions. Gennadiy