7 May
2010
7 May
'10
10:37 p.m.
On 6 May 2010 06:01, Daniel James <dnljms@gmail.com> wrote:
This will collide with the existing 'boost::hash' (an implementation of 'std::hash').
Good point. unordered_map's hash definitely has stronger claim. The simplest fix would be just changing the namespace to boost::hashes. Alternatively, the library could be renamed to Cryptographic_Hash and use boost::cryptographic_hash as its namespace, though that would cut off the possibility of following Paul Bristow's suggestion. Any preferences or other ideas? ~ Scott McMurray