Joel de Guzman wrote:
Darren Cook wrote:
But your functor is a lot longer, and the advantage wasn't explained (or perhaps what I mean is that the advantage of lazy evaluation wasn't explained or demonstrated here).
Is it any quicker to run? If the advantage is that you get better re-use, then I think you need a follow-on example that shows that re-use, and how that wouldn't be achieved with normal c++ functors.
I can't explain eveything in the starter kit. It's explained in latter parts of the doc: http://tinyurl.com/6kpcn. The starter kit is meant to be as concise as possible.
However, the fact that you mentioned it makes me want to improve on it. Any suggestion is very welcome.
Hmmm.... Ok, maybe I can put a blurb or that links to the main doc. Anyway, thanks for the comment. I think your suggestion (follow-up example that shows that re-use) might also work fine. It's hard to keep the starter kit as minimal as possible, yet sufficient. I'll think about it a some more. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net