On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
Ok, here are rc2s. Fixed (I believe) are: * Now includes winapi library * Underscores instead of periods in the names * No more weit metadata in the tar file.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/11048326/boost/boost-1_56_0a1c2.zip https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/11048326/boost/boost-1_56_0a1c2.tar.gz
Please check them out, let me know what problems you have.
gcc 4.8 on Linux x86_64, builds fine in C++03 and C++11 modes. Boost.Signals fails to build with MSVC 12: .\boost/iterator/iterator_facade.hpp(526) : error C2039: 'decrement' : is not a member of 'boost::signals::detail::named_slot_map_iterator' .\boost/signals/detail/named_slot_map.hpp(80) : see declaration of 'boost::signals::detail::named_slot_map_iterator' .\boost/iterator/iterator_facade.hpp(677) : see reference to function template instantiation 'void boost::iterator_core_access::decrement<Derived>(Facade &)' being compiled with [ Derived=boost::signals::detail::named_slot_map_iterator , Facade=boost::signals::detail::named_slot_map_iterator ] .\boost/iterator/iterator_facade.hpp(676) : while compiling class template member function 'boost::signals::detail::named_slot_map_iterator &boost::iterator_facade<boost::signals::detail::named_slot_map_iterator,boost::signals::detail::connection_slot_pair,boost::forward_traversal_tag,Value &,ptrdiff_t>::operator --(void)' with [ Value=boost::signals::detail::connection_slot_pair ] .\boost/signals/detail/named_slot_map.hpp(84) : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::iterator_facade<boost::signals::detail::named_slot_map_iterator,boost::signals::detail::connection_slot_pair,boost::forward_traversal_tag,Value &,ptrdiff_t>' being compiled with [ Value=boost::signals::detail::connection_slot_pair ] .\boost/iterator/iterator_facade.hpp(544) : error C2039: 'advance' : is not a member of 'boost::signals::detail::named_slot_map_iterator' .\boost/signals/detail/named_slot_map.hpp(80) : see declaration of 'boost::signals::detail::named_slot_map_iterator' .\boost/iterator/iterator_facade.hpp(690) : see reference to function template instantiation 'void boost::iterator_core_access::advance<Derived>(Facade &,__w64 int)' being compiled with [ Derived=boost::signals::detail::named_slot_map_iterator , Facade=boost::signals::detail::named_slot_map_iterator ] .\boost/iterator/iterator_facade.hpp(689) : while compiling class template member function 'boost::signals::detail::named_slot_map_iterator &boost::iterator_facade<boost::signals::detail::named_slot_map_iterator,boost::signals::detail::connection_slot_pair,boost::forward_traversal_tag,Value &,ptrdiff_t>::operator +=(__w64 int)' with [ Value=boost::signals::detail::connection_slot_pair ] Master branch is also affected. Somehow develop is not affected although Boost.Signals code is the same. I suspect the compiler is behaving unstable. I'll create a pull request to adjust the compiler version check for a workaround for this problem. There is also the problem with Boost.Atomic described in the nearby thread "[atomic] Structs with default constructor". The fix is in develop and will be merged to master in a few days. Will I need to explicitly ask to include this fix into the final release? The question about the packages revision is still relevant.