Le 28/03/12 23:37, lcaminiti a écrit :
Vicente Botet wrote
Good news. The regression test show now that a lot of test pass and when failing the reason is accessible.
Congrats :)
Is there a reason in general not to use Boost.Test or this issue is limited to the Sun platform? In my libraries I used Boost.Test just for convenience -- I could just as easily catch the errors and return an exit code instead of using Boost.Test... IIRC Boost.Test doesn't works neither on cygwin.
I'm using <boost/detail/lightweight_test.hpp> which is really lightweight and works everywhere. Here it is a simple example #include <boost/thread/thread.hpp> #include <boost/detail/lightweight_test.hpp> int main() { boost::thread::id id = boost::this_thread::get_id(); BOOST_TEST(id != boost::thread::id()); return boost::report_errors(); } Boost.TypeTraits has defined some macros that make use of Boost.Test or an internal framework. HTH, Vicente