6 Mar
2013
6 Mar
'13
12:05 p.m.
On 06-03-2013 11:48, Philip Bennefall wrote:
The reason I bring it up is because it goes against the Boost software license, and since a lot of libraries seem to use boost.config and thus this file in some capacity, I am unsure of what parts of Boost I can use without including this extra requirement. it would be nice if the maintainer would look into this.
+1 This is serious problem that needs to be fixed. -Thorsten