On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj@gmail.com> wrote:
AMDG Emil Dotchevski wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart@sig.com> wrote:
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
If the "we want no warnings dammit" crowd main argument is "at my company we have zero-warnings policy, we can't do anything about it" then arguing whether or not any particular warning should be addressed is pointless (OTOH, I'd bet that no company has zero-warnings policy because some warnings can't be dealt with any other way but by disabling them.)
Disabling a warning, provided the scope is controlled, is fine.
Yes, but with GCC you can't control the scope.
It isn't quite as fine-grained as msvc's mechanism, but you can use #pragma GCC system_header It seems to handle templates okay in recent versions.
I was wondering if the GCC pragma works well. If it really does, why not just add it in boost/config and be done with it. :) Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode