My reasoning was that the BGL does leverage the concept library in its implementation, and this technique seems like a reasonable way to structure complex C++ libraries that might be usefully applied by your audience in their own projects. My suggestion of a brief survey / mention of the BGL was only to provide some context for discussion of this technique. Not to suggest that you survey it's API, usage modes, etc. But perhaps you're right and my suggestion is not appropriate. - Chris "David Abrahams" <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote in message news:crmeck$qnm$1@sea.gmane.org...
Christopher D. Russell wrote:
* ... your ideas here ... :)
A brief mention / survey of the BGL. Specifically its use of Boost.Concept.
Is that consistent with the abstract for the talk? What you're describing doesn't seem to be about implementation techniques.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost