Roland Schwarz schrieb:
So I am wondering if I understand something wrong? Isn't the decoupling of access and traversal meant to allow "Reference" be a proxy object?
On page http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_35_0/libs/iterator/doc/new-iter-concepts.htm... I read:
A difficult design decision concerned the operator[]. ... operator[] is only required to return something convertible to the value_type (for a Readable Iterator), and is required to support assignment i[n] = t (for a Writable Iterator).
So I believe my intended interator is categorized as Readable, Writeable, Random access traversal However operator[] returns something that is convertible to "reference" and not to value_type (as I expected). Can this behaviour of iterator_facade be controlled somehow? -- _________________________________________ _ _ | Roland Schwarz |_)(_ | aka. speedsnail | \__) | mailto:roland.schwarz@chello.at ________| http://www.blackspace.at