28 Dec
2008
28 Dec
'08
12:36 a.m.
AMDG David Abrahams wrote:
- transform_iterator.hpp - ...
for the various partition_point overloads?
Something like that seems likely. I'm still having trouble understanding how you can implement a specialization for transform_iterator without knowing more than actually possible about the semantics of the transformation function.
I think the idea is that if an optimized partition_point exists for the underlying iterator, the partition_point specialization for transform_iterator should use it. This has nothing to do with the specific transformation function. In Christ, Steven Watanabe