On 7/15/07, Steve Trutane <trutane@gmail.com> wrote:
On this recent slashdot thread, there seems to be more griping than advocacy regarding Boost and template metaprogramming:
I'd say that any uglyness in Boost's code will be in the implementation - specifically hacks for compatibility with old or buggy platforms. If conforming C++09 compilers were ubiquitous, Boost would start looking a lot better. But that is many years off :/
Any "Pretty" Code Out There? http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=250311&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=19862839
Just wondering if the Boost devs have any words of wisdom on this matter.
Steve _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Cory Nelson http://www.int64.org