1 Jun
2009
1 Jun
'09
6:58 a.m.
2009/5/29 Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org>:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Daniel James <daniel_james@fmail.co.uk> wrote:
2009/5/28 Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org>:
Does it matter that some standard libraries might add <initializer_list> even though the compiler doesn't have support yet?
That's already the case for g++ 4.4 when not compiling in c++0x mode.
Sorry, I was being dense and missed your point. I've had a look at the Visual C++ 10 beta results and that has the situation you describe and BOOST_NO_INITIALIZER_LISTS is required in that case. I went ahead and added a check to config/suffix.hpp to set BOOST_NO_INITIALIZER_LISTS if the headers aren't available: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/53524/trunk Daniel