30 Mar
2010
30 Mar
'10
11:34 p.m.
On 30 March 2010 17:49, Christopher Jefferson <chris@bubblescope.net> wrote:
On 30 Mar 2010, at 22:47, Scott McMurray wrote:
The library *does* impose a limit: It has to allocate space, so there's necessarily the limit implied by the size of the type passed to the allocator to request the space.
By the same argument, should we changed the hashed containers to "dynamically unspecified size hashed containers"?
Can you elaborate? Your question makes me think of the "unordered_" prefix, which I can't mentally link to the discussion of boundedness.