7 Sep
2010
7 Sep
'10
12:27 a.m.
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Peter Myerscough-Jackopson <peter.myerscough-jackopson@macltd.com> wrote:
As others have noted, a common idiom for using a boost function object is to check if it is non-empty prior to calling it, is it an unreasonable extension to add this call? I am aware TR1 has subsumed “function” and so it is probably not possible remove the if-clause, but adding an unchecked invoke has significant benefits, [unchecked_invoke(), might be a better name than purely invoke()].
+1 -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com