On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj@gmail.com> wrote:
AMDG
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
Q: Who would want to know that boost::exception_ptr's destructor is not virtual?
A: Only someone who wants to build a polymorphic type hierarchy with boost::exception_ptr as a base, calling delete through a boost::exception_ptr base pointer.
So, exception_ptr's destructor should be virtual to keep *that* guy out of trouble?
Emil, can you please silence the compiler somehow?
I had silenced it already, I believe. That's what triggered that particular rant. :) I see that your patch deals with the warnings better. For now, I will leave my commit from earlier today, but probably after the release is out I'll fix it your way. Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode