On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess@nist.gov> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Monday, April 25, 2011, Artyom wrote:
From: Ryou Ezoe <boostcpp@gmail.com>
Sort by code point is not the best solution. But at least, it's consistent if we use one encoding.
No it is not, UCS encoding has different order in different representations:
UTF-8 and UTF-32 order is consistent i.e.
Sorry if I'm adding to the pedantry, but Is UCS an "encoding"? My completely non-expert impression was that UCS was a character set, and UTF-8/16/32, etc. were different encodings of that character set?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk21x6QACgkQ5vihyNWuA4WNRgCg3cNYEtR3OsoohkVIyMrkF/fI K0kAniA90yt0lgawTahW8+R1Y9ktoLa8 =qO/h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Sorry. I should say encodings of UCS. -- Ryou Ezoe