Boris wrote:
Marcin Kalicinski wrote:
[...] The biggest value of property_tree is in its easy to use interface, that should not be compromised, if at all possible. I have been already reassured in this view by quite many people who took their time to review the library.
I was trying to see the big picture: I rather prefer a C++ standard based on a few well-known concepts like containers, iterators, algorithms etc. instead of having a C++ standard with hundreds of components which are tailored for specific needs,
Well, I think we need both. Boost.MultiIndex is a great library and can do all kinds of wonderful things. But I would still like to see a bidirectiobal map (boost::bimap) written as a wrapper around it to get an easy and specialized interface. -Thorsten