Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto@cs.auc.dk> wrote in message news:cjkbk6$mdh$1@sea.gmane.org...
"Jeff Garland" <jeff@crystalclearsoftware.com> wrote in message news:20041001140415.M13015@crystalclearsoftware.com...
6) Presidential filter example While many of us see the humor in this, there was at least one objection to introducing 'political comedy' into boost. Overall, the example should be renamed and reformulated since in a few years no one will get the joke anyway. Sorry to go politically correct here, but boost needs to be above the fray.
I probably don't have the same political view as Jonathan,
Nobody has the same political views as me >:->
Yep. But it's not a matter of differing "political views", it is a matter of censorhip. More specifically, an unilateral decision on part of the review manager to censor a submission. There is a reason why in most civilized societies censorship decisions are handled with care, by a group, following written rules.