Re: [boost] [Fit] formal review starts today

On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 5:19:52 PM UTC-6, Steven Watanabe wrote:

AMDG

On 03/04/2016 11:55 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:

...

Even if you are not for the library in its current state your comments will help a lot to improve it, so please, could you reconsider to give us more feedback on other parts of the library?

I suspect that I'd be saying a lot of the same things over again. For example:

#include

struct identity { template<class T> T operator()(T t) { return t; } };

int main() { boost::fit::conditional(identity(), identity())(0); }

1> boost\fit\conditional.hpp(84): error C2500: 'boost::fit::detail::conditional_kernel': 'identity' is already a direct base class 1> with 1> [ 1> F1=identity, 1> F2=identity 1> ] 1>

This is by design. I should document this. It makes absolutely no sense to pass the same function to conditional, and is most likely a mistake in the users code.

In Christ, Steven Watanabe

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost