Re: [boost] [transaction] New Boost.Transaction library under discussion

Zitat von "Stewart, Robert" <Robert.Stewart@sig.com>:

but "transact" is shorter and seems appropriate.

I also think Boost.Transact/namespace transact is the most appropriate. anyone object? (since I had to look it up myself, for the non-native speakers among us: it's not an abbreviation, but the corresponding verb of "transaction")