
14 Oct
2005
14 Oct
'05
4:08 p.m.
Matt Calabrese wrote:
Also, you could look at the factorial as 3 radians * 2 radians, thus the term would be radians^3 / radians^2, which is again, just a radian.
-- -Matt Calabrese _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Sure. I could also say that the factorial is 3 radians^2 * 2 radians^2 and get yet something else as a result. I don't get it. You need to explain some mathematical principles underlying what you're doing and not just try to come up with something that seems to fit in this particular case. You have to explain not just sin(x), but log(x) and arcsin(x), too.