18 Feb
2011
18 Feb
'11
5:35 p.m.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Daniel Larimer <dlarimer@gmail.com> wrote:
I do not like the boost::function problems either, it was more of a notional. There is always this(http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cpp/fastdelegate2.aspx) drop in replacement for boost::function.
The article's analysis is wrong. From the beginning Boost.Function used the "small object optimization" to avoid an "expensive heap memory allocation that [would be] required to store the member function and the bound object on which member function call is made" -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com