-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Matthieu Schaller Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 9:51 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] Review request: extended complex number library
The original question still remains. Should a boost::complex class rely on the std::complex implementation no matter how (im-)precise or should boost provide a truly precise complex class.
Believing that 'if a little does it well, a lot will do it better', I would say go for a truly precise complex class. But if both behaviours can not-too-painfully be provided using a macro, that might please everyone. Paul --- Paul A. Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB UK +44 1539 561830 07714330204 pbristow@hetp.u-net.com