8 Sep
2009
8 Sep
'09
8:37 p.m.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Stewart, Robert<Robert.Stewart@sig.com> wrote:
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Stewart, Robert<Robert.Stewart@sig.com> wrote:
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
Insisting to fix warnings is somewhat insulting to the author of the library, too. It presumes that they did something unreasonable, when in fact the warning itself may be unreasonable.
The warning may, in fact, be unreasonable, but the library author should do all possible to quiet the warning.
Why?
For the reasons I already gave.
To address someone's preference? Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode