Le 26/10/12 05:51, Gennadiy Rozenal a écrit :
David Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com> writes:
BOOST_TEST? Ok. How about this:
BOOST_TEST - check level tool BOOST_TEST_REQUIRE - require level tool BOOST_TEST_WARN - warning level tool
Hi, I don't think that there should be conflicts but I wanted just to report that boost/detail/lightweight_test.hpp defines #define BOOST_TEST(expr) ((expr)? (void)0: ::boost::detail::test_failed_impl(#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__, BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION)) #define BOOST_ERROR(msg) ::boost::detail::error_impl(msg, __FILE__, __LINE__, BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION) #define BOOST_TEST_EQ(expr1,expr2) ( ::boost::detail::test_eq_impl(#expr1, #expr2, __FILE__, __LINE__, BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION, expr1, expr2) ) #define BOOST_TEST_NE(expr1,expr2) ( ::boost::detail::test_ne_impl(#expr1, #expr2, __FILE__, __LINE__, BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION, expr1, expr2) )
Does anyone have any other comments about new features? Do they look release ready?
I could not say nothing until the documentation is ready for review :( Please add an history with a list of the new features. Best, Vicente