Re: [boost] [hash2] Formal Review Begins

Zach Laine wrote:

Also, even if you don't change any of the names above, please don't use the phrase "sized_range", since we now have a std::ranges concept with that name that means something substantially different

That thought has occurred to me, but I never came up with a replacement name that I was happy with.

(std::ranges::sized_range requires std::ranges::size(x), for instance, where yours does not).

If we add overloads for the _range functions that actually take ranges and not iterator pairs, the hash_append_sized_range function will however require and use r.size(), instead of taking the iterator distance.