Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
Can we make it a typedef?
Yes, we can :-) What name for this typedef do you want? size_type? (there is already 'typedef typename utf::basic_cstring<CharT>::traits_type traits_type;') Thanks, Boris
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Gennadiy Rozental Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 6:29 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] [test] failure of basic_cstring_test with GNU libstdc++
Gubenko, Boris <boris.gubenko <at> hp.com> writes:
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
Go ahead and fix it. You can post patch here.
Attached is rather obvious patch, verified with GCC 4.3.0 and 3.4.6.
Ok to commit?
We can make 'typename utf::basic_cstring<CharT>::size_type'
a macro, to reduce clutter,
Can we make it a typedef?
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost