From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Joaqu=EDn=20M=AA=20L=F3pez=20Mu=F1oz?= <joaquin@tid.es>
Thorsten Ottosen ha escrito:
[...] index::list should be sufficient.
Still, I don't like "list" alone. If an using directive is in affect, then
using boost::multi_index;
multi_index_container < employee, list< ordered_unique<member<employee,string,&employee::name> >, ordered_non_unique<member<employee,int,&employee:age> >,
does not read so well, as it is not clear (IMHO) what list is supposed to be introducing. Compare with:
multi_index_container < employee, index_list< ordered_unique<member<employee,string,&employee::name> >, ordered_non_unique<member<employee,int,&employee:age> >,
What do you think?
Don't forget "indices" or "indexes" in lieu of "index_list." multi_index_container < employee, indices< ordered_unique<member<employee,string,&employee::name> >, ordered_non_unique<member<employee,int,&employee:age> >,
-- Rob Stewart stewart@sig.com Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;