27 Sep
2004
27 Sep
'04
12:26 p.m.
"Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy@meta-comm.com> escribió en el mensaje news:m265617c8o.fsf@meta-comm.com...
Could somebody who cares about Borland take a look/comment of these two:
I don't have BCB anymore so I'm just guessing.
Fixed. This one was easy, there was a macro switch for Borland in the header file which was not used in the test file.
Probably fixed too, but I can't tell. The problem is that BCB5.6.4 accepts: short v = 1 ; short& rv = 2 ; int& ri = rv ; // Temporary created here I just changed the "short" for "double" in the hope that being a narrowing conversion it won't do it. Thanks Fernando Cacciola SciSoft