18 Jan
2010
18 Jan
'10
12:36 p.m.
Domagoj Saric wrote:
A while back, in various threads more or less related to the topic, I posted various ideas and/or code contributions to the effect of improving boost::function in terms of efficiency (concentrated on invocation speed, assignement performance/overhead and reducing template and RTTI bloat) and configurability, however there was no "official response" as to whether it was any good, or whether any of it would be accepted or what's wrong with it if not.
You should contact the maintainer of the library, Douglas Gregor, which I assume is the one taking those decisions.