9 Feb
2004
9 Feb
'04
2:57 p.m.
"Jeff Garland" <jeff@crystalclearsoftware.com> writes:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 15:28:08 -0500, David Abrahams wrote
Because we don't have the luxury of an extra compilation stage like Corba does. There's no way to stop unwinding with catch(...), store whatever arbitrary exception object was thrown, and then rethrow it later.
Corba doesn't really solve the problem with compilation, it just makes it easier for the user by generating binding code.
Code generation == an extra compilation stage. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com