On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Thomas Heller <thom.heller@googlemail.com>wrote:
On 11/24/2011 10:55 PM, Nathan Ridge wrote:
From: thom.heller@googlemail.com
Besides:
That's a neat idea, but I'm not sure how it's relevant to this discussion. Those who are objecting to Boost.Local are not objecting on the basis that the generated function object is not a Phoenix function...
You are of course right, the first two links are not about local function definitions. However, the third link proposes a solution that should bring everyone together: Local functions combined with the power of Phoenix.
Actually, I'm confused as well, Thomas. I wouldn't have thought that making the local functions generated by Lorenzo's Local macros could have addressed your previously expressed objections to Local. Granted, there's been a lot of discussion and I may have missed something. Care to clarify? - Jeff