22 Jul
2006
22 Jul
'06
9:37 p.m.
On 7/22/06 4:13 PM, "Sebastian Redl" <sebastian.redl@getdesigned.at> wrote:
Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
Just tested here, mine too. (Gmail)
Submit a bug report. This behaviour differs from the de-facto standard set by most other clients.
From what I see from other responses in this thread, I'm not sure that there really is a de-facto standard. It is implementation-defined which fields a reply-to-all function should look at. A key point I'm trying to make is that the "reply-to" field is supposed to override the "from" field, so you shouldn't look at both fields when composing a reply-to-all.
-- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com