7 Mar
2005
7 Mar
'05
6:09 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
Well, now Joel and Jeff Garland have both told me by private mail that there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with having a discussion about what's worth voting for, and I am basically convinced. I think certain aspects of the logo are more important than others and should be considered. But before I start blurting out any specifics, let's hear from the group. Is there any reason we shouldn't talk about how to choose? We do almost everything at boost by public consensus. Why not this time?
I strongly agree. Opinions aren't sacred, they can (and should) be argued about. Let's trust in civilized and constructive discussion which this list has proven to be good at in the past. Regards, Stefan